The Shadows of Totalization, Part XX
I take this statement,
And translate it into this one,
Rather than saying I translate the first statement into the second, perhaps it would be better to say I repeat it, with difference.
Rather than saying I believe the first statement “Descartes founds his philosophy on a self which is self-evident,” is a true statement, perhaps it would be better to say it also repeats (something), with difference.
I don’t know anything incorrect about the statement, “Descartes founds his philosophy on a self which is self-evident,” but I do know in my saying of it(in my authoring of it,) I have introduced differences from whatever it was Descartes did (say or do, in philosophy.)
Do I have any grounds for considering this difference, whatever it is, anything but a lack, (of adequacy, of completeness, of closeness of reading, of comprehension, of diligence, etc.)?
Descartes founds his philosophy on a self which is self-evident.
And translate it into this one,
I have a concept of my self wherein I understand my self as self-evident.
Rather than saying I translate the first statement into the second, perhaps it would be better to say I repeat it, with difference.
Rather than saying I believe the first statement “Descartes founds his philosophy on a self which is self-evident,” is a true statement, perhaps it would be better to say it also repeats (something), with difference.
I don’t know anything incorrect about the statement, “Descartes founds his philosophy on a self which is self-evident,” but I do know in my saying of it(in my authoring of it,) I have introduced differences from whatever it was Descartes did (say or do, in philosophy.)
Do I have any grounds for considering this difference, whatever it is, anything but a lack, (of adequacy, of completeness, of closeness of reading, of comprehension, of diligence, etc.)?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home